On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Andreas Kling wrote: > > > Good idea in general, though it doesn't work for InlineBox since its bits > are spread across public, protected and private. > > I'm not sure it's worth losing those classifications for the sake of the > anti-bloat mechanism. > > We wouldn’t have to lose those classifications. We’d just have to lose our > convention that all public are grouped together, etc. We can intersperse > public/protected/private keywords between bitfield definitions. Right, but those keywords would pertain to the struct containing the bitfields, not InlineBox itself. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you? -Kling
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
