Hi Dmitry, As you mention in your email, Adobe is interested in the Shadow DOM effort and we will coordinate with you to understand better how/if/where we can contribute.
Good luck with both the implementation and the standards work! Kind regards, Vincent. Dmitry wrote: Hi WebKit! I wanted to let you know that we are planning to implement the Shadow DOM specification (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/shadow/index.html) in WebKit. For now, its public-facing APIs will hide behind ENABLE(SHADOW_DOM) flag and help gather implementer and developer feedback. Shadow DOM spec is part of the Web Components effort (see overview here: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/explainer/index.html), and is on the standards track in the WebApps WG. Work is ongoing (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/showdependencytree.cgi?id=14972), with participation from Microsoft and Mozilla. Adobe also expressed interest in contributing. In addition, Shadow DOM is being considered as the replacement of similar plumbing in SVG for SVG v.Next. This particular effort is just starting in SVG WG. The meta bug to follow is https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63606. :DG< _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
