On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Darin Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > Instead of doing all of this work, have you considered just treating > GoogleURL in much the same way as WebKit treats ANGLE? You could perhaps > just commit a copy of GoogleURL into Source/ThirdParty, and then WebKit as a > whole could switch to a consistent KURL implementation.
WTFURL is a copy of GoogleURL adapted to WebKit so I hope "it is not gonna be too much work" (tm). :) As I understand, it was decided 2 years ago not to add GoogleURL into Source/ThirdParty to avoid pulling some dependencies and to have this important piece part of the WebKit project (I was not at that particular session). > Also, be mindful that if your goal is to avoid having two implementions of > KURL, then part of accomplishing that goal is also switching Chromium over > to WTFURL. I'm guessing that is probably not in your plans. Do you know if > someone is motivated to make that happen? (Chromium consumes GoogleURL > directly, albeit mostly through the GURL front-end, which might be portable > to WTFURL.) I assumed Adam Barth could help since he bootstrapped the whole WTFURL project. If there is no interest from Chromium to get rid of the split, I would rather keep improving the current KURL than completely switch the implementation. Cheers, Benjamin _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
