On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:33 PM, William Siegrist wrote: > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:26 PM, William Siegrist wrote: > >> >> On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Mark Rowe wrote: >> >>> >>> On 2012-02-29, at 18:20, Dirk Pranke <dpra...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Mark Rowe <mr...@apple.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 2012-02-29, at 17:05, Lucas Forschler <lforsch...@apple.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If anyone notices any bad behavior that they suspect may be related to >>>>> this >>>>> upgrade, please let us know. >>>>> >>>> >>>> svn.webkit.org (and trac) appears to be very unhappy at the moment; >>>> seems like this is likely related? >>> >>> It may be that svn.webkit.org is unhappy about the thundering herd of >>> reconnecting build slaves after the downtime. We'll look in to it. >>> >> >> I'm rebooting it again. I'm not sure if this is the same cause as the >> overnight problems or the slaves getting new checkouts. >> > > Our database pooling could not handle the frequent reboots of the clients, so > I'm rebooting most of webkit.org to clean up the mess. >
And we're back up again. -Bill _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
