On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Anders Carlsson <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On May 16, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Darin Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On May 16, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > > >> there is another conflict which is entirely our own fault. It is > between WTF::bind and the new std::bind from C++11 > > > > We should find a good solution for this. I’d suggest talking with Anders > Carlsson about it. > > I've run into this and had to use the fully qualified WTF::bind in those > cases. > > FWIW, I don't think we really need using directives for the std namespace > - the fully qualified name is short enough and I like the additional > clarity that we're calling something in the standard library. > I would be strongly in favor of using fully qualified names for std classes (std::bind instead of just bind). This isn't a problem in other large codebases, even ones that use far more types from std:: (like containers) and that have column limits. - James > - Anders > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
