On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Stephen Chenney <schen...@chromium.org>wrote:
> I don't doubt there are poor comments, both outdated and useless. That's > a reviewing failure. You have simply highlighted the fact that any standard > for comments requires reviewer attention. Hence "cost of maintaining > comments". > I don't know how to review a patch and make sure all relevant comments are updated. As I have illustrated before, you can be modifying a function X, then a completely random function A which calls B that in turn calls C that in turns D ... that in turn calls X may have a comment dependent on the previous behavior of X without ever mentioning X. How am I supposed to know that there is such a comment? - Ryosuke
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
