On Aug 23, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Jussi Kukkonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> A few months ago the CSS WG approved unprefixing Animations, > Transitions and Transforms implementations. By now IE, Firefox and > Opera have released betas or previews with unprefixed versions of at > least some of those. > > Simon Fraser already commented that Transforms require more work > before un-prefixing (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93136): >> We need to make a bunch of behavior changes before we can drop prefixes on >> transforms. From memory: >> 1. Require units on perpective (function and property) >> 2. Implement transform function matching for animation according to the spec >> 3. Implement the 3D rendering context stuff properly (layer intersection) >> 4. Change background-attachment:fixed behavior. >> 5. Probably more. > > How about Animations and Transitions, is there a reason for me to not > send patches that enable the unprefixed properties and events in those > specs at this point? I think we should review the current working draft of the specs, and understand how far we deviate from them (in the form of a set of filed bugs), rather than doing a cowboy unprefixing like the other vendors. Simon _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
