I've posted a patch to remove the "webkit" prefix from
requestAnimationFrame. [1] The question is whether or not to continue to
support the prefixed version. I propose dropping it for the following
reasons:

1. We're changing the callback semantics to match the spec. [2]

2. IE10 is shipping with this unprefixed. [3]

3. Toolkits already use the unprefixed version. [4]

4. The advice on the internet recommends everyone use the polyfill
technique. [5]

I'm curious what everyone else thinks.

James

[1] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99116
[2] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66683
[3] http://caniuse.com/#feat=requestanimationframe
[4] https://gist.github.com/1579671
[5]
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/DOM/window.requestAnimationFrame
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to