I think discussing the merits of the whatwg process is probably off topic for this list.
- Maciej On Nov 29, 2012, at 10:32 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > thanks for the clarification. > > I would suggest that if, as in this case, Hixie rejects a feature > without convincing the WHATWG community that the data, use cases etc > do not support the introduction of a feature, then the WHATWG process is > broken. > > regards > SteveF > > On 30 November 2012 06:18, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Nov 29, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.st...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> maciej wrote: >>> >>>> The WHATWG has pretty clearly rejected the idea of the <main> element >>> >>> >>> can you point to a clear rejection in any of the relevant threads on >>> the WHATWG apart from hixies? >>> >>> I would suggest the WHATWG has general support for adding main, but I >>> may not be understanding what is meant by a whatwg rejection in this >>> case. >> >> I mean that by the whatwg process, if Hixie says no clearly and >> definitively, that is the decision. I say this not to judge, just to >> describe what it is. This does not of course mean that everyone who >> participates in the WHATWG agrees. >> >> The only thing I see as likely to change things in the whatwg is >> implementations appearing. >> >> Regards, >> Maciej >> > > > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner > Technical Director - TPG > > www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | > www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner > HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - > dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ > Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
