I agree with you guys. Most of the sites now uses SVG. But I'm worrying about the resource constraint platforms where browser is not intended for open Internet browsing, rather it is used for building user interfaces(like navigation systems, tv, set-top-box). Though using SVG in the constraints environments increases the productivity, but most of the platforms still lacks OpenGL ES2 or OpenVG & survives only with 2D accelerators!!. As far I know most of the pages still uses SVG to show only very basic graphics elements like buttons,... and it may be lack of proper tools to author svg documents.
On 26 January 2013 03:47, Philip Rogers <p...@google.com> wrote: > We could reduce a bit of maintenance cost by removing all the defines. I > ran some numbers and I'm not sure we are there yet in terms of lost > productivity, even on the Chromium side. SVG adds around 20% to debug > compile times: > > Linux, Z620, no goma, clean build, ninja, Debug DumpRenderTree, without > SVG: 4m05s > Linux, Z620, no goma, clean build, ninja, Debug DumpRenderTree, with SVG: > 4m52s > > Linux, Z620, no goma, clean build, ninja, Release DumpRenderTree, > without SVG: 3m58s > Linux, Z620, no goma, clean build, ninja, Release DumpRenderTree, with > SVG: 4m36s > > For Chromium developers not working on WebKit it is probably best to > continue building without SVG, even though I must warn you that you'll miss > out on the some sweet graphics. > > PhilipI agree with you guys > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Elliott Sprehn <espr...@chromium.org>wrote: > >> Perhaps the time to remove ENABLE_SVG is in several years once many pages >> depend on it and disabling it results in a busted browser... >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Arunprasad Rajkumar < >> ararunpra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Eric, Most of the resource constraint environments(embedded systems) >>> still disables the SVG. If the define is removed code size of WebKit will >>> be increased by atleast 3 to 4M. >>> >>> >>> On 26 January 2013 01:01, <webkit-dev-requ...@lists.webkit.org> wrote: >>> >>>> This question came up in:https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92393 >>>> >>>> Do any ports still disable SVG? Should we be removing the ENABLE_SVG >>>> defines (and potentially unifying SVG and HTML style resolve more >>>> closely)? >>>> >>>> -- >>> *Arunprasad Rajkumar* >>> http://in.linkedin.com/in/ararunprasad >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> firstname.lastname@example.org >>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> email@example.com >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >> >> > -- *Arunprasad Rajkumar* http://in.linkedin.com/in/ararunprasad
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev