On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alec Flett <alecfl...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Well, nobody is explicitly using LChar with SerializedScriptValue (maybe > it should, maybe that's another issue) but I guess this is why I'm asking > - I'm happy to just deal with this in IDB with some ugly reinterpret_casts > here and there (ok maybe not happy, but satisfied enough) if folks prefer > that. I don't personally find uint8_t to be any more intuitive than char, > but it sounds like some do. Nevermind... > Well, since you never use character types and only raw data, just ignore my comment. As far as I know, it is already common to use signed char for raw data (in the network stack for example). Benjamin
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev