On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alec Flett <alecfl...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Well, nobody is explicitly using LChar with SerializedScriptValue (maybe
> it should, maybe that's another issue)  but I guess this is why I'm asking
> - I'm happy to just deal with this in IDB with some ugly reinterpret_casts
> here and there (ok maybe not happy, but satisfied enough) if folks prefer
> that. I don't personally find uint8_t to be any more intuitive than char,
> but it sounds like some do. Nevermind...
>

Well, since you never use character types and only raw data, just ignore my
comment.

As far as I know, it is already common to use signed char for raw data (in
the network stack for example).

Benjamin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to