There are DocumentMarker, or DocumentMakerDetails. Which do you have in your mind?
For me, it seems DocumentMarker is the right place to put such an ID since DocumentMarkerDetails is an immutable, shared object and giving such ID breaks the assumption for instance sharing. Or you can possibly introduce another DocumentMakerDetails for the "contextual marker". This approach might be cleaner. By introducing the new subclass, it won't interfere existing marker implementations. One caveat of this approach is that this needs extra heap allocations since DocumentMarkerDetails with unique IDs cannot be shared and will be allocated per marker. Sorry for my slow response. Hope this helps. On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Rouslan Solomakhin < rouslan+web...@chromium.org> wrote: > Howdy folks, > > The contextual spellcheck in Chromium needs to identify the spellcheck > request that added spelling markers to the document. This information will > be used to provide a feedback loop to the contextial spellcheck. I was > thinking about adding an ID field to DocumentMarkerDescription detail. Is > this a correct approach? > > Thank you all for thoughts and suggestions! > > Cheers, > Rouslan > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
