Hi Ossy, removing Windows CE code sounds ok to me, since it shouldn't be a big deal to restore it from SVN if it becomes useful again. If it's ok, I'll check the source code and post a patch in one of the next weeks?
-- Patrick On 29.08.2014, at 13:42, Osztrogonác Csaba <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Patrick Gansterer írta: >> On 31.01.2014, at 22:10, Anders Carlsson <[email protected]> wrote >>> looks like the last legitimate commit to the Windows CE port was on >>> November 3rd November 2013, almost 3 months ago. >> What's the minimum upstream interval for downstream fixes to show ongoing >> activity? >>> I also seem to remember that there's no version of MSVC for Windows CE that >>> can handle the C++11 features that we now use in WebKit. (Correct me if I'm >>> wrong on this!) >> Windows Embedded Compact 2013 updated the compiler for CE. >>> With this in mind, does it make sense to keep the Windows CE port in the >>> tree or should we remove it? >> Does it hurt somebody in the daily workflow? If yes, where exactly? >> I'm still working on getting rid of WebKit/wince by merging it into >> WebKit/win (with only a few #if WINCE) to reduce the impact of the WinCE >> port, but it's hard if there is nobody who finds time for reviewing patches. >> :-/ (e.g. webkit.org/b/119518 or webkit.org/b/123803 waiting for months - >> but I don't want to blame somebody by this!) > > The last commit from WinCE maintainer was on 20th November 2013, > 9 months ago - https://trac.webkit.org/changeset/159534 > > Since then other contributors landed 41 changes touched WinCE files: > https://trac.webkit.org/search?q=wince&noquickjump=1&changeset=on > > Do we have any benefit if we keep these crufts in the trunk? > > br, > Ossy > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
