That looks like a pretty good performance win. I'd advocate for SmallVector and Vector, then.
-Filip > On Nov 20, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Chris Dumez <cdu...@apple.com> wrote: > > The corresponding Blink bug did contain some performance data: > CrBug#229226 <https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=229226> > > Kr, > -- > Chris Dumez - Apple Inc. > Cupertino, CA > > > > >> On Nov 20, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Geoffrey Garen <gga...@apple.com >> <mailto:gga...@apple.com>> wrote: >> >>> I wonder what the downsides are to this approach. Footprint of Vector? >> >> It looks like the original change was motivated by shrinking Vector: >> >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97268 >> <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97268> >> >> Sadly, it didn’t include any data on the observed benefit :(. >> >> Geoff >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org <mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org> >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
