On Tue, 29 Sep, 2015 at 16:40:53 GMT, Brent Fulgham wrote: > We are using native CMake from the Windows command line, though I = > believe the Cygwin version should work. > > I have a longer-term goal of being able to do development without = > requiring Cygwin, though we are a long way from achieving that just yet. > >> On Sep 29, 2015, at 12:36 AM, youenn fablet <youe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Quick question: is CMake used from cygwin?
Just an FYI, Cygwin's CMake is intended to build Cygwin binaries, not "native" Windows binaries. They are considered completely different platforms (e.g., I think on Cygwin, WIN32 is not defined). >> Also, is there a current/future Windows build efficiency benefit? Use Ninja. Be happier because now your build times are…much smaller. Or sadder if you used that time for coffee breaks ;) . --Ben Pass "-G Ninja" to CMake and use ninja to build. You must run ninja (and CMake) from a Visual Studio shell for the target compiler though (or use vsvarsall.bat). That restriction is well worth the performance improvement though. And if you thought moving from make -> ninja was great, VS -> ninja is *way* better :D . https://github.com/martine/ninja _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev