+1. I am in favor of this as well! -Brent
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Saam barati <sbar...@apple.com> wrote: > > +1. > I like how “override” only reads. > > Saam > >> On Mar 3, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: >> >> I think "virtual" + "override" is more of a historical artifact than >> the preferred style because we used to have OVERRIDE macro before all >> compilers supported C++11. I think we should just use only "override" >> going forward. >> - R. Niwa >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Darin Adler <da...@apple.com> wrote: >>> Antti proposed using only “override” a while back since it’s less verbose >>> and still unambiguous. I don’t think we reached consensus on which style to >>> prefer for the project, though. >>> >>> — Darin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> webkit-dev mailing list >>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
