On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 9, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@igalia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote:
>>> I think this second option may suppress the warning when you have forgotten 
>>> to list one of the enum values, since there is now a default case. I 
>>> believe that's the reason for the recommended option.
>>
>> Ah, good point. Normally we do want a warning when a new enum value has been 
>> introduced. That could be avoided by this variant:
>>
>>      static WKAutoplayEvent toWKAutoplayEvent(WebCore::AutoplayEvent event)
>>      {
>>          switch (event) {
>>          // ...
>>          }
>>
>>          RELEASE_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED();
>>      }
>>
>> That seems nicer than this:
>>
>>      static WKAutoplayEvent toWKAutoplayEvent(WebCore::AutoplayEvent event)
>>      {
>>          switch (event) {
>>          // ...
>>          }
>>
>>          ASSERT_NOT_REACHED();
>>          return static_cast<WKAutoplayEvent>(0);
>>      }
>

One annoying thing is that I've seen clang complaining about that
return statement being an unreachable statement while gcc doesn't :(.
So we probably shouldn't have return statement, not to mention that 0
may not be a valid enum value.

- R. Niwa
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to