10.05.2017, 12:42, "Ryosuke Niwa" <rn...@webkit.org>: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <m...@apple.com> wrote: >>> IntegrationTests doesn't distinguish them from performance tests, or API >>> tests. And most test integration only incidentally. FunctionalTests doesn't >>> distinguish them from any of the other kinds of tests besides performance >>> tests. >>> >>> I think just plain Tests is better than calling out a characteristic that >>> isn't actually unique. It's by far the most common type of test we have, so >>> it's ok for it to be the unmarked category. >> >> The problem with Tests is that it competes with Tools. >> (Renaming Tools is a lot harder not to mention it's a pretty >> descriptive name already). >> >> How about CorrectnessTests or CoreTests then? > > I guess another name along this line would be RegressionTests.
Why not just keep historical name, so nobody is confused what is what? > >>> I think the only names that are both accurate and unique are likely to be >>> bad for autocomplete (WebTests, WebContentTests, etc). >> >> I guess we can also move WebKit.xcworkspace into Source, and rename >> WebKitLibraries to SystemInterfaceLibraries (and maybe move into >> Source), and then move Websites into Tools. >> >> - R. Niwa > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev