For some generic programming, this form can be dramatically shorter:

e.g. 

template<typename KeyArg, typename MappedArg, typename HashArg, typename 
KeyTraitsArg, typename MappedTraitsArg>
template<typename K, typename V>
ALWAYS_INLINE auto HashMap<KeyArg, MappedArg, HashArg, KeyTraitsArg, 
MappedTraitsArg>::inlineAdd(K&& key, V&& value) -> AddResult
{
    return m_impl.template add<HashMapTranslator<KeyValuePairTraits, 
HashFunctions>>(std::forward<K>(key), std::forward<V>(value));
}

vs.

template<typename KeyArg, typename MappedArg, typename HashArg, typename 
KeyTraitsArg, typename MappedTraitsArg>
template<typename K, typename V>
ALWAYS_INLINE typename HashMap<KeyArg, MappedArg, HashArg, KeyTraitsArg, 
MappedTraitsArg>::AddResult HashMap<KeyArg, MappedArg, HashArg, KeyTraitsArg, 
MappedTraitsArg>::inlineAdd(K&& key, V&& value)
{
    return m_impl.template add<HashMapTranslator<KeyValuePairTraits, 
HashFunctions>>(std::forward<K>(key), std::forward<V>(value));
}

It is also the only format available for lambdas, so people are probably 
getting used to it.

Not sure it’s worth it to avoid it.

- Sam

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Brady Eidson <beid...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> I just noticed this tonight. When a change is made to one of these functions, 
> prepare-ChangeLog doesn't log the functions that changed.
> 
> I have a question and a request.
> 
> Question:
> 
> The functions in question where I noticed this:
> auto WebURLSchemeTask::didComplete(const ResourceError& error) -> 
> ExceptionType
> 
> Would normally be written as:
> WebURLSchemeTask::ExceptionType WebURLSchemeTask::didComplete(const 
> ResourceError& error)
> 
> Is there some actual value to using this syntax other than… being 
> syntactically different, and being just a little shorter?
> 
> Request:
> 
> Until we fix prepare-ChangeLog, and unless there is some great advantage to 
> this syntax that I'm not aware of… it's hold off on using it more.
> 
> Thanks,
> ~Brady
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to