On 08/12/2017 11:40 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Michael Catanzaro > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> That's a good thing. >>> >>> I believe all Linux distros we support have this, right? >>> And all the scripts actually assume python2.7 (AFAIK). >>> >>> Would it work for everyone having as shebang : >>> >>> #!/usr/bin/env python2.7 >>> >>> ? >> >> >> So this is by far the easiest solution of those that have been proposed. I >> think we should try this as a stopgap until macOS is fixed to provide a >> python2 binary. > > What's wrong with using that as the permanent solution until we make > it Python3 compatible? > > I don't think it's wise to assume /usr/bin/python2 will be added on > Mac anytime soon. > > - R. Niwa > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >
+1, python2.7 is well supported among different systems. It would be desirable to move to Python 3 eventually, but that's an endeavor that should not be taken lightly, as many things can break in subtle ways. -- Alicia _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
