Hi all,
I am writing to propose using C++11 uniform initializer syntax in member
initializer lists. The following:
class A {
public:
A(B&& b, float i, int j)
: m_b(WTFMove(b))
, m_i(i)
, m_j(j)
{
}
...
};
Would become:
class A {
public:
A(B&& b, float i, int j)
: m_b { WTFMove(b) }
, m_i { i }
, m_j { j }
{
}
...
};
Using uniform initializer syntax in member initializer lists would make the
syntax we use for member initializer lists consistent with the syntax we use
for non-static data member initializers. It would also cause a compile time
error if member initialization required a narrowing conversion (e.g. implicit
float to int conversion). Another benefit of using this syntax is that it
allows initialization of a struct using aggregate initialization.
Dan
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
