08.12.2017, 20:18, "JF Bastien" <j...@chromium.org>:
Also, as we discussed on the github bug the JSC binary is available as part of the WebAssembly waterfall that Google maintains at wasm-stat.usThe build is pretty straightforward:
FWIW, it's easy to extend this script to work for Windows and Linux too by replacing -DPORT=Mac with -DPORT=JSCOnly
,I understand that you've got a policy of only taking "official" binaries. The GTK team would be the official maintainer of the Linux port? There's an official jsc binary is available on MacOS :-)On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Lucas Forschler <lforsch...@apple.com> wrote:Hi Mathias,The Linux archives could be exposed on the build-archives page. In fact, we already store the output of the builders in S3. However, the igalia team only uploads a small file with a pointer to their internal builds. If I recall, they have limited bandwidth, and prefer to store their builds behind their firewall to save on external traffic to buildbot/s3.If you look here you will see a ‘transfer-to-s3’ build step.The archive the builder creates is uploaded, here is a sample.Opening that up shows the location where the archive is stored:Built product is available here:I cannot reach that link, so I would assume it’s behind the igalia firewall. If the GTK team wanted to support making these accessible, they have everything they need. They could either choose to open up their firewall so external folks could access them. Or, they could put full archives on build.webkit.org (which would be transferred to s3/webkit build archives).Maybe someone over there would be willing to take on this work if it is in their budget. (Both time and bandwidth)LucasOn Dec 8, 2017, at 12:44 AM, Mathias Bynens <m...@google.com> wrote:Dear WebKit friends,_______________________________________________Please consider hosting precompiled `jsc` binaries for Linux somewhere official. Perhaps https://webkit.org/build-archives/? The build bots already generate those binaries anyway — all that’s missing is an additional build step that archives and uploads them.Doing so would make it easier for developers to test JSC directly, or to include JSC when running benchmarks such as the Web Tooling Benchmark (ref. https://github.com/v8/web-tooling-benchmark/pull/29#discussion_r155587697).I recently built a tool that automates the process of installing precompiled binaries for various JS engines: https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/jsvu It’d be great to be able to support _javascript_Core on linux32 and linux64 as well!Prior discussion: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179945#c11Regards,Mathias
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
--
Regards,
Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
