On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez < clo...@igalia.com> wrote:
> On 12/12/17 21:18, Mathias Bynens wrote: > >> We do not have any Linux binaries blessed, approved or endorsed by > Apple, > >> and we never will, regardless of what domain it's hosted on. However, > you > >> can get official Linux binaries from parties that own Linux ports. > > > > If the hosting domain doesn’t matter, would you object to it being > > webkit.org? All I meant to say is that this would be my preference. > > > > Just to clarify, I’d be excited to get the downloads at all! I understand > > who maintains the Linux port, and I appreciate everyone’s hard work on > > this. > > > > We (Igalia) as WebKitGTK+ maintainers have control over the domain > webkitgtk.org, so we have currently the capacity to host there the > requested files. But we don't have any control over the webkit.org domain. > > Also note that we only distribute WebKitGTK+ as source tarballs. > We don't ship binaries. > > This binaries from the buildbot bots are not intended for third-parties > uses. We just happen to generate them as part of a CI infrastructure. > In any case, we are happy to make easier for you to fetch them if you want. > Thank you! That would be lovely, especially if https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180678 could be resolved at some point by including the *.so libraries in the archives.
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
