On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:14 AM, z...@falconsigh.net wrote:
Some GCC-and-libstdc++ configurations would still require a fallback implementation
After the std::optional fiasco, I'm pretty nervous about the state of using new C++ 17 features.
We've wound up in a situation where we're OK with increasing the compiler requirement to recent versions... as long as WebKit continues to build with ancient libstdc++. So increasing use of more C++ 17 standard library features seems difficult, and of really limited benefit if we're going to need to keep a fallback WTF implementation around, which will receive limited testing from us, but which will be used by most of our users in practice (at least for GTK).
This is a hard problem. I don't have any answers. But I don't think our status quo is very good. https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185198 is still unresolved and I'm out of ideas....
Michael _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
