11.05.2019, 02:47, "Yusuke Suzuki" <ysuz...@apple.com>: > Cool! So, > > 1. We can use GCC 7 > 2. We can use libstdc++7 > > Is my understanding correct? Basically, this means that we can use cool C++17 > features super aggressively :) Not so aggressively with library features, a few of them require libstdc++ 8 or even 9[1]. However, there is portable implementation of std::filesystem [2] which we could use as a "polyfill" if needed. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/status.html#status.iso.2017 [2] https://github.com/gulrak/filesystem -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should we use it? Alex Christensen
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should we use it? Alex Christensen
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should we use it? Konstantin Tokarev
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should we use ... Michael Catanzaro
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should we ... Michael Catanzaro
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Konstantin Tokarev
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Alex Christensen
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Michael Catanzaro
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Michael Catanzaro
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Yusuke Suzuki
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Konstantin Tokarev
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Michael Catanzaro
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Sam Weinig
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Michael Catanzaro
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Guillaume Emont
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Sam Weinig
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Guillaume Emont
- Re: [webkit-dev] C++17 is here. Should... Guillaume Emont