We like declarative @property and will definitely consider implementing it. We like CSS.registerProperty less since it is a performance footgun.
antti On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:25 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud <andr...@chromium.org> wrote: > Thanks for the response. I did read through that issue at some point, but > I didn't detect an underlying endorsement. :-) > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 AM Simon Fraser <simon.fra...@apple.com> > wrote: > >> In general we are supporting. We've given some feedback here: < >> https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/940> >> >> Simon >> >> On Apr 23, 2020, at 2:44 AM, Anders Hartvoll Ruud <andr...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In Blink there's currently an intent to ship >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/3ygpsew53a0/T7acB6sRBQAJ> >> @property from CSS Properties & Values >> <https://drafts.css-houdini.org/css-properties-values-api-1/#at-property-rule>. >> I've noticed that there's an in-progress implementation of >> CSS.registerProperty in WebKit, and I'm wondering if you're also >> considering implementing @property, or you have any thoughts on it in >> general. >> >> Anders >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> email@example.com >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list email@example.com https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev