We like declarative @property and will definitely consider implementing it.
We like CSS.registerProperty less since it is a performance footgun.


   antti

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:25 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud <andr...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> Thanks for the response. I did read through that issue at some point, but
> I didn't detect an underlying endorsement. :-)
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:33 AM Simon Fraser <simon.fra...@apple.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In general we are supporting. We've given some feedback here: <
>> https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/940>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> On Apr 23, 2020, at 2:44 AM, Anders Hartvoll Ruud <andr...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In Blink there's currently an intent to ship
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/3ygpsew53a0/T7acB6sRBQAJ>
>>  @property from CSS Properties & Values
>> <https://drafts.css-houdini.org/css-properties-values-api-1/#at-property-rule>.
>> I've noticed that there's an in-progress implementation of
>> CSS.registerProperty in WebKit, and I'm wondering if you're also
>> considering implementing @property, or you have any thoughts on it in
>> general.
>>
>> Anders
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to