Any one will to share plans for the javascript implementation
E4X support ? bytecode compliation ? Mike On 5/25/06, Colin Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not to be a spoilsport, but Jonathan 'Wolf' Rentzsch is not someone who would pan WebKit without good reason. He did mention script.aculo.us's unit tests failing. My main question is: Is WebKit's JS worse than FF's, or simply not the same, which could lead to breakage. -Colin On May 25, 2006, at 3:04 PM, Abhi Beckert wrote: > I've seen several blog posts recently (eg: > http://rentzsch.com/code/dashcodeForAjaxAppDevelopment) that boldly > state WebKit's "ajax support" is vastly inferior to FireFox. All of > them have been very vague and haven't specified exactly where WebKit > is lacking, so I thought I'd ask you guys: Is WebKit inferior, or is > it just because FF is cross platform/has more users, and the companies > are focusing on FF first, and other engines later? > > If these claims are unfounded, lets chop them off at the head. > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
