On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 07:58 -0700, Martin Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[email protected]> wrote: > > This would be the recommended parent widget for normal browsers, and > > tools such as devhelp, but we would retain the ability of using other > > widgets whenever web compatibility is not a problem, or can be worked > > around in other ways (for MokoFingerScroll there should be no problem as > > it doesn't draw scrollbars AFAIk). > > I like this idea good bit. Are there still sites that fail with our current > setup? I'm working on scrollbars now, so maybe I'm in a good place > to fix any remaining bugs.
Yes, check this one out: http://www.bench.com/viewer/benchmark.asp?cp=0 > If we do decide (because of some unfixable bugs or whatever) that we > must expose a different version of the WebView that draws its own > scrollbars, would it make sense to simply implement pan scrolling > to cover the usecase of MokoFingerScroll? I believe that there is already > support for pan scrolling in WebCore, so it's probably just a matter of > connecting the pre-existing dots. That way this could be used on > platforms outside of Moko as well. I think that would rock, yes. I'm in favor! Cheers, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[email protected]> GNOME Project _______________________________________________ webkit-gtk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-gtk
