El jue, 02-02-2012 a las 17:34 +0100, Xan escribió: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Carlos Garcia Campos <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Since setting one resets the other, the one returning something > > different than 1 is the effective one. If both return 1, no scale factor > > is applied so the assumption is still valid. > > Does not look like the most elegant API in the world to me.
Agree, problem is, what is the effective zoom initially when both scale factor are 1? > I suppose > that if we consider a getter of the active zoom useful it can always > be written later using that algorithm inside WebKitGTK+ though. In any case, as I said, most of the apps use one scale factor or the other, so they don't need to know the effective one. Apps that want to scale text will use set/get_text_zoom_level and apps that want to scale page content will use gt/set_page_zoom_level. An apps that have a preference to control it, already know the effective zoom too. > Xan > -- Carlos Garcia Campos http://pgp.rediris.es:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF3D322D0EC4582C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ webkit-gtk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-gtk
