El vie, 24-02-2012 a las 13:43 -0800, Martin Robinson escribió: > Recently at https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75459, the > question was raised whether to provide Vala bindings as part of the > WebKitGTK+ release. I can see both some benefits and a bit of a > maintenance burden.
I don't think we should provide any bindings, we already provide gobject introspection support, so that should be enough for bindings. > It seems that the infrastructure for GIR and Vala metadata has not > been the most stable, so we'd have to update this information as time > goes on and the tools improve. On the other hand, this would make it > much easier for embedders to use WebKitGTK+ with Vala since the > bindings would always be up-to-date. > > Another interesting data point is that this is something we would need > to provide with the WebKit2 release. What are the opinions of the > community about this? Is anyone strongly opposed? We just need to add gobject-introspection support to WebKit2. Documentation is already annotated, so it's a matter of adding the Makefile bits. -- Carlos Garcia Campos http://pgp.rediris.es:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF3D322D0EC4582C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ webkit-gtk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-gtk
