On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Jimmie Lin <jimmie....@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am developing a custom WebKit-based application which has a web
> interface providing a javascript API (stored in a variable called "System")
> to several "child interfaces" in frames. I am providing the frames a
> stripped down version of the API (stored in "System.User") using code that
> looks like this:
>
> var frame = document.getElementById("frame");
> frame.contentWindow.System = System.User;
>
> Now, I do not want the child frame to be able to do something like
> "document.window.top.System = null" and destroy the whole thing running
> above. However I cannot turn on the "sandbox" iframe feature as that would
> prevent me from providing the frame with its own copy of the API in the
> first place.
>

If your goal is simply to prevent someone from replacing your "System"
property, you should just make it read only.


> I have attemped to do the following:
>
> frame.contentWindow.parent = null;
> frame.contentWindow.top = null;
>
> But this does not work, as the .top property is a read-only one and cannot
> be overwritten. Other methods using just Javascript to solve this problem
> proved not possible. Since I can deploy the application using a custom
> build of WebKit, where in the source should I look into modifying to
> totally remove the .top property in frames?
>
> I want the frame to be able to communicate with the parent strictly by
> using the System object in it, but full access to the frame should be
> completely unidirectional.
>

If you want to remove the top property from the exposed API, just remove it
from the bindings (DOMWindow.idl). But I think it is a bad idea; altering
standard APIs always leads to problem down the road.

Benjamin
_______________________________________________
webkit-help mailing list
webkit-help@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-help

Reply via email to