Hi everyone, > > You possibly had discussed that, but why not make 2.2 to be 2.1, since > > the later is not release yet.
QtWebKit 2.2 is indeed a bit confusing name for the branch that Ademar just created. It could be called 2.1.1 (or something like that) instead, since the intent is only to back-port HTML5 media support on mobile platforms to once it is ready. No new C++ APIs should be needed for that. I don't think we'll have to maintain 2.1 and this branch separately since they'll be very much the same. On the other hand, adding new features in a patch level release is also confusing. Regards, Henry _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
