On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:19:57 +0200, Robert Hogan <[email protected]>
wrote:
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] Does QtWebKit API tests need attention?
Date: Wednesday 01 June 2011, 21:18:14
From: Robert Hogan <[email protected]>
To: Alexis Menard <[email protected]>
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 21:09:13 you wrote:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Robert Hogan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If we get the API tests passing again, shouldn't we make the
> webkit.org build red if an API test fails?
That's the idea.
What bothers me about the API tests is that it bails out of the test slot
on the first failure so there could be other stuff lurking there.
So to prevent further regressions we should mark the current failures
XFAIL, file bugs for them and do the buildbot stuff required to make an
API failure red on build.webkit.org.
Yeap. I think we all agree on this!
Any reason not to do that?
Ossy - any idea how to promote API test failures to a red?
It's trivial. After we push in expected fails and then the api-tests goes
green we need to modify 1 line in master bot config and then wms needs to
run a reconfigure on that.
Zoltan
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
