As far as I'm concerned, a step for WebKit2. No'am ________________________________________ From: Jocelyn Turcotte [jocelyn.turco...@nokia.com] Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:36 AM To: ext Andreas Kling Cc: Rosenthal Noam (Nokia-CTO-Qt/SiliconValley); webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] Enabling WebGL by default
I'm not against it, but what is the end goal you guys have? Is this just a step for WebKit2 or do you want to push WebGL further in WebKit1? Jocelyn On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:45:10 +0200 ext Andreas Kling <kl...@webkit.org> wrote: > Love it. No objections here, though I'd suggest that we only support > it officially (whatever that means) on Qt5/WebKit2. > > -Kling > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:33 PM, <noam.rosent...@nokia.com> wrote: > > > Hi folks > > There was a lot of work done by Jarkko, Andrew and others to get > > WebGL up and running on Qt. > > Also, WebGL is getting more and more traction in the industry. > > I believe that it's time we let it build by default, while keeping > > it off in the settings by default. > > This would allow more people to test WebGL more easily, and would > > also protect us from Apple/Google build breakages since the bots > > are going to build it. Now that the bots can use OpenGL, adding > > tests would be a possible next step. > > > > Any objections? > > No'am > > _______________________________________________ > > webkit-qt mailing list > > webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org > > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt > > > _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
