Hi guys, I believe we have some concrete points here already, so I will revise all the emails from this thread, compile a list of the last "open bits" and tomorrow morning I will open a meta-bug followed by the missing API features bugs. With that, we can move the more specific discussions into the correct bugs.
If somebody else has anything to add here, please let us know! :) Cheers, jesus On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø <[email protected]>wrote: > On 07.12.11 20:29, [email protected] wrote: > >> > >> property Item page; >>> >>> >>> I'm not fully aware of the use-cases of this. I couldn't find any qml >>> tests using it and we don't use it on snowshoe as well. So then I >>> agree with Jocelyn and I'm up with moving this to experimental and >>> keep it aligned with Simon's "criteria" of what stays or not in >>> experimental. >>> >> >> Good point. Does anybody else have an opinion here? >> > > This ties in with whether or not we expose the APIs of Flickable. Without > those APIs the page item is less useful. Either way, I'm fine with making > the page experimental, but I highly suspect it will be useful API at some > point. > > tor arne > > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
