On Wednesday 06 June 2012 09:37:14 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Wednesday 06 June 2012, simon.hausm...@nokia.com wrote: > > Hm, okay, maybe we can improve the timing :) > > > > What would be the advantage of waiting until Qt 5.0 is released? What > > would > > be different at that point? > > By branching of the same version as Qt 5.0 it will hopefully benifit from > the stabilization up to Qt 5.0, plus it means we can hopefully keep the > QtWebKit for Qt 4.x version close to the branch used for Qt 5.0, which > means we can possible merge similar patches, etc. > > From an communication POV it is also simpler to explain that this fork will > provide the features available in QtWebKit for Qt 5.0 to Qt 4.x (except > WebKit2 of course).
Short slightly OT question: My understanding was, that Qt 5.0 will not ship with the WebKit2 API yet? Sadly I can't find the blog or email, but I think it was Lars Knoll who said that WebKit2 will only be integrated in a Qt 5.x release? So: Is Qt 5.0 really going to ship with a first release of a QML WebKit2 API? Considering that neigher examples or documentation public yet, I doubt that. Bye, thanks for the clarification. -- Milian Wolff | milian.wo...@kdab.com | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
