Hello, On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:38:55 +0200 ext Osztrogonac Csaba <o...@inf.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
> Hi, > > Jocelyn Turcotte írta: > > My quick opinion on it is that we could: > > - Switch the official bots to Qt5 as soon as possible to aid the Qt5 beta > > I don't understand what do you mean about "switch". We still have many Qt5 > bots: > - Qt Linux 64-bit Release (Perf) == Qt5-WK1 builder and perf tester bot - > http://build.webkit.org > - Qt Linux 64-bit Release (WebKit2 Perf) == Qt5-WK2 builder and perf tester > bot - http://build.webkit.org > - x86-32 Linux Qt Release - Qt5-WebKit1 == Qt5-WK1 builder, JSC/layout/API > tester bot - http://build.webkit.sed.hu > - x86-64 Linux Qt Release WebKit2 (Amazon EC2) == Qt5-WK2 builder, > JSC/layout/API tester bot - http://build.webkit.sed.hu > - x86-32 Linux Qt Release WebKit2 == Qt5-WK2 builder, JSC/layout/API tester > bot - http://build.webkit.sed.hu > - ARMv7 Linux Qt5 Release (Build) == Qt5-WK2 builder > - Qt WK2 EWS == Qt5-WK2 Early Warning System bot - http://queues.webkit.org/ > Thanks for clarifying. I meant running layout tests on the webkit.org bot slaves. Wasn't there something related to layout tests that we couldn't do as long as we want to support Qt4? My understanding is quite limited in this area so there might not be any issue. Jocelyn _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
