Sure! On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Simon Hausmann <simon.hausm...@digia.com>wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 03, 2012 01:15:41 PM Osztrogonac Csaba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Any other pros/cons? Simon? Noam? > > > > If there isn't any objection, and there isn't new regressions > > I'm going to do the update on the bots this friday. > > > > br, > > Ossy > > > > Andras Becsi írta: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 2 October 2012 15:36, Balazs Kelemen <kbal...@webkit.org> wrote: > > >> Hi qtwebkittens! > > >> > > >> I would like to update our qt5 tree because a patch of mine has been > > >> landed > > >> today that is needed to go ahead with pixel tests. Are you ok with > that? > > > > > > If there are no layout test regressions or build errors with current > > > qt5.git master then nothing is blocking us from rolling to a more > > > recent Qt5 hash. > > > I think most of us already use a recent Qt5 anyway. > > > > > >> Alternatively we can select a set of pending changes important for us > - > > >> if > > >> there are such changes - and delay the update until all of them lands. > > >> Opinions? > > > > > > I'd rather update than cherry-pick, maybe switch to a more frequent > > > update process if needed. > > Sounds good to me :) > > Rafael, can you take care of the Mac build bot? > > Simon > _______________________________________________ > webkit-qt mailing list > webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt > -- Rafael Brandao @ INdT
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
