Hello, On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:43:30PM +0200, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > So, I'm wondering if it would make sense to move them into a separate > repository, which could then being built separately from QtWebKit. > So far, I didn't have to modify any code in WebKit, so my plugin should > actually work along with an unmodified version of QtWebKit.
Since we won't offer official support and releases for this code, I think that this whould help putting the barrier lower for the surrounding community to contribute to this effort. > But in order to build it, I needed to make use of some of the private > headers (such as QWebPageAdaptor). > Given that the corresponding symbols are defined (at least in Ubuntu's > libQt5WebKit.so), do you think it makes sense to distribute private > headers as well? Those headers are going to change for sure, so personally I think that it would make it easier if you would be able to use the widgets/webkitwidgets stable API instead. The performance loss that you would suffer from the WebKit1 graphics limitations are going to be more important than the widgets overhead anyway IMHO. I think that using QWebPageAdapter is a great idea short term, but it would be a mistake to guarantee you that we won't change this module architecture detail considerably in the future. Please don't hesitate du ping a few people on IRC to discuss the details. Cheers, Jocelyn _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
