Hi Rafael, Thanks a lot for maintaining the buildbot until now!
I do have a Qt WK2 Mountain Lion buildbot running for a while already. It is currently connected to http://build.webkit.sed.hu/ and is mainly compiling and running some WebGL pixel tests. Maybe we could move that one over to build.webkit.org to replace your current buildbot. If you have a few minutes, maybe we could look into that next week? Zeno On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Rafael Brandao <rafael.l...@openbossa.org>wrote: > Hello QtWebKittens, > > We will turn off the Qt Mountain Lion Release buildbot soon, since INdT is > now focused > on other projects and we don't have the man power needed to properly > maintain the bot. > > I'm planning to do this over the next week. It should be easy to > reactivate it, so I hope someone else > can keep up with this effort. > > Thanks, > > Rafael > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:32 PM, "Árvai, Zoltán" > <zar...@inf.u-szeged.hu>wrote: > >> Hi QtWebKit hackers, >> >> we started upgrading QtWebKit buildbots and EWS bots >> today to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS + GStreamer 1.0 + Qt 5.0.1 . >> >> Using GStreamer 1.0 will be mandatory soon, see this mail for details: >> https://lists.webkit.org/**pipermail/webkit-dev/2013-** >> January/023246.html<https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2013-January/023246.html> >> (You can easily install GStreamer 1.0 on Ubuntu 12.04 - see >> >> https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/**QtWebKitGardening<https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitGardening>for >> details) >> >> It is a high time to review which bots we still need, which bots we >> don't need anymore. Or do we need new bots with different configuration? >> >> Currently we have the following bots: >> >> build.webkit.org >> ================= >> >> - Qt Linux Release - 32 bit WK1 only build + layout tests + API tests >> - Qt Linux Release minimal - 32 bit WK1 only build >> (good for catching broken ifdef guards) >> - Qt Windows 32-bit Release - WK1/WK2 build >> (MS Win Server 2008 R2, MS Visual Studio 2010 Express) >> >> performance bots: >> ------------------ >> - Qt Linux 64-bit Release (Perf) - WK1 only build and perf tests >> - Qt Linux 64-bit Release (WebKit2 Perf) - WK2 build and perf tests >> >> The performance results are collected by perf-o-matic server - >> http://webkit-perf.appspot.com , but this tool is not user friendly >> to catch performance regressions, because you have to select tests >> one by one and check them manually. Nowadays they collect performance >> results, but in these circumstances we need someone who actively checks >> them. Do we want to appoint someone, or reuse these resources for more >> important tasks? >> >> offline bots: >> -------------- >> - Qt Linux ARMv7 Release - It is offline, because we have a same >> bot on build.webkit.sed.hu to build ARM binaries for the tester bot. >> >> - Qt Windows 32-bit Debug - We used it when cross compiling on Linux was >> possible with MinGW (with Qt 4.8). But now the Windows build works >> with MSVC on native Windows and we don't have more Windows hardware. >> >> These bots were not used for a long time. We suggest to >> delete them completely from build.webkit.org waterfall. >> What do you think about it? >> >> bots maintained by the community: >> ------------------------------**---- >> - Qt Linux MIPS32R2 LE Release >> - Qt Linux SH4 Release >> - Qt Mountain Lion Release - maintained by INdT >> (Is INdT still intereseted in QtWebKit on Mac?) >> >> >> build.webkit.sed.hu >> ==================== >> - x86-64 Linux Qt Release - 64 bit WK1 only build + layout/API tests >> - x86-64 Linux Qt Debug - 64 bit WK1 only build + layout/API tests >> - x86-64 Linux Qt Release WebKit2 (Amazon EC2) - >> 64 bit build + WK2 layout/API tests >> - x86-64 Linux Qt Release WebKit2 (Pixel Tests) >> 64 bit build + WK2 UI process side pixel tests >> - x86-32 Linux Qt Release WebKit2 >> 32 bit build + WK2 layout/API tests >> - x86-64 Mountain Lion Qt Release(WebGL Tester)(maintained by zalbisser) >> 64 bit build + fast/canvas/webgl WK2 tests + API tests >> - x86-32 Linux Qt Release NRWT >> 32 bit WK1 only builder + layout tests with 4 parallel threads >> (It is an experimental bot, because parallel testing is very flakey, >> on Qt, see >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_**bug.cgi?id=77730<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77730>and >> >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_**bug.cgi?id=106218<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106218>for >> details.) >> - ARMv7 Linux Qt5 Release (Build) - WK1 only build for ARM traditional >> platform (ARM instruction set, not Thumb2) >> - ARMv7 Linux Qt5 Release (Test) - JSC+layout tests on a Panda board >> - x86-32 Linux Qt Debug - 32 bit WK1 only build + layout/API tests >> >> Bots for QtWebKit 2.3 (used by carewolf) >> ------------------------------**----------- >> - QtWebKit2.3-branch x86-32 Linux Release >> - QtWebKit2.3-staging-branch x86-32 Linux Release >> >> How long do you need to run these bots? After we upgrade the OS to >> Ubuntu 12.04 they might not work properly anymore. To take notice >> of coming 2.3 relase we might be able to migrate them to a virtual >> machine has same environment as the actual one. (Debian Squeeze, Qt 4.8) >> >> --- >> >> We hope we will finish the upgrade this week, you can see the >> status here: >> https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/**QtWebKitBuildBots<https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/QtWebKitBuildBots> >> >> On behalf of Szeged team, >> Ádám Kallai (kadam) and Zoltán Árvai (azbest_hu) >> >> >> >> On 01/21/2013 05:02 PM, Osztrogonac Csaba wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Qt 5.0 was released a month ago. And I have two major questions >>> about the future of the QtWebKit trunk (svn.webkit.org) development. >>> >>> Question no 1: >>> --------------- >>> >>> There is a plan about migration from GStreamer 0.1 to 1.0: >>> [webkit-dev] PSA: Migration plan to GStreamer 1.x >>> http://lists.webkit.org/**pipermail/webkit-dev/2013-** >>> January/023244.html<http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2013-January/023244.html> >>> ( >>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_**bug.cgi?id=106085<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106085>) >>> >>> Now we have Debian Squeeze, Ubuntu 11.10 and 12.04 buildbots too, but >>> installing GStreamer 1.0 to Debian Squeeze and Ubuntu 11.10 is a little >>> bit complex. It is possible, but installing a meta package from a PPA >>> on Ubuntu 12.04 is much more simpler. >>> >>> That's why I propose switching QtWebKit buildbots to Ubuntu 12.04 (LTS) >>> and dropping trunk buildbot support for older distros. (Or should we >>> upgrade to non-LTS, but newer Ubuntu 12.10? I haven't tested it yet.) >>> >>> Any opinions/objections? >>> >>> >>> Question no 2: >>> --------------- >>> >>> Which Qt version / revision should we use for WebKit trunk? >>> >>> We always use build-qt5.sh script to build Qt for WebKit trunk to reduce >>> source incompatible changes and make it simple to have same environment >>> to reproduce bugs, etc. ( >>> https://github.com/ossy-**szeged/qt5-tools<https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools>) >>> >>> But now we are pinned on a very old, pre Qt 5.0 revision: >>> 8d77ff1ef2422259dd6baed5cae981**5260e5bee2 (Tue Dec 4 11:54:27 2012 >>> +0100) >>> >>> I think it's time to update Qt on the bots/developers machines. >>> So the question is which Qt revision should we update to? >>> - Qt 5.0.0 release version? (I tested it on Linux, and works fine) >>> - Or trunk qt5.git? (I haven't tested it yet.) >>> >>> And then should we do regular weekly/mothly update again? >>> Or should we do updates on demand only? >>> >>> br, >>> Ossy >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> webkit-qt mailing list >>> webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org >>> http://lists.webkit.org/**mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt<http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt> >>> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> webkit-qt mailing list >> webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org >> https://lists.webkit.org/**mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt<https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt> >> > > > > -- > Rafael Brandao @ INdT > > _______________________________________________ > webkit-qt mailing list > webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt > >
_______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
