On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:09:14AM +0000, Saha, Deepjyoti wrote: > > > Hi Jocelyn, > > Thanks for the response! :-) > > Yes, even I feel that these API's can be implemented as static functions and > I would like to submit a patch for this. > But it can be done in QWebSecurityOrigin (as you suggested) or be implemented > in a new class "QWebSecurityPolicy" (to maintain the coherence between > classes in QtWebkit and WebCore) ? > Please let me know your opinion.
QWebSecurityOrigin should be fine, I think it's preferable not to create a new class if it is only going to contain static functions. > I checked the bug you mentioned: > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31875 (Impossible to make > XMLHttpRequest from locally stored HTML page) > So this patch can be submiited under the existing bug report itself correct ? Ideally you should start from the work already done in the patch there (if it would also solves your use case). Since Simon started it I think that it would be best if you get his opinion first. I don't know if you can simply expose WebCore functions in QWebSecurityOrigin or if this would need some closer attention. He's on vacation right now so you might have to wait 2 weeks to be able to find him. Cheers, Jocelyn _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list webkit-qt@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
