On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:39:07 -0300, Marcelo Santana
<[email protected]> wrote:

[...]
 
> The question is: 
> What would be the most appropriate way to solve this issue thinking
> about future releases of weblate and perhaps packaging it in debian?

I think now I have found a best solution. I started using mod_wsgi in
daemon mode and now everything are working correctly even with the
newest version of python-cryptography.

I understood better after read this:
https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/2916

If someone is interested, below is an example of configuration
file with mod_wsgi in daemon mode for Apache2:


<VirtualHost *:80>
    ServerAdmin [email protected]
    ServerName example.com
    
    Alias /robots.txt /var/www/html/weblate/data/static/robots.txt
    Alias /favicon.ico /var/www/html/weblate/data/static/favicon.ico

    Alias /static/ /var/www/html/weblate/data/static/

    <Directory /var/www/html/weblate/data/static/>
        Require all granted
    </Directory>

    WSGIDaemonProcess example.com python-path=/var/www/html/weblate
    WSGIProcessGroup example.com
    WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL}

    WSGIScriptAlias / /var/www/html/weblate/weblate/wsgi.py 
process-group=example.com
    WSGIPassAuthorization On

    <Directory /var/www/html/weblate/weblate/>
        <Files wsgi.py>
            Require all granted
        </Files>
    </Directory>

</VirtualHost>

Kind regards,

-- 
Marcelo Santana (aka msantana) <[email protected]>
4096R/5B76053D: 8E9B 1014 4019 3526 C1C6  B0AC A3C0 DA1E 5B76 053D

Attachment: pgp0MEJvYmnpq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Weblate mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cihar.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/weblate

Reply via email to