Hi On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 20:23 +0100, Jean-Baptiste wrote: > I'm worried about this review mechanism and if I'm sure it is a good > feature, it rises multiple questions about how we might work in the > future.
The review process is completely opt-in, so everything will be same till you add reviewers to your project and start to approve strings. > How will it be enabled? > . Per weblate instance? Language? Project? Per project. > Will an unreviewed string be commit upstream? Yes, unreviewed strings will behave same as so far. The only change is that reviewed strings will be locked from updates. > How will be reviewer for hosted.weblate.org? > Do we have per project rights? I'm not yet sure whether I will provide this feature in the free plan. Anyway it will be configurable by project admins. > When and who contact to makes this happens? > When and who communicates the new process to contributors? Whoever will setup that for a project :-). There will be documentation for all this, it's just not yet completed: https://docs.weblate.org/en/latest/workflows.html -- Michal Čihař | https://cihar.com/ | https://weblate.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Weblate mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cihar.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/weblate
