WRT to clsql-connection-pool, is there any reason why this should be a
seperate package that needs to be loaded instead of a direct change to
the code base?  CLSQL is not thread safe, but the connection pool
solves that.

I see no reason why Weblocks would not benefit from having the
connection pool changes integrated - I don't think we need a separate
(and thus optional) package.  Anyone using an app that uses clsql
would need it, including weblcks-clsql-demo.

Yarek

On Dec 16, 2:42 pm, Stephen Compall <[email protected]> wrote:
> svg writes:
> > - make clsql store thread safe
> > - add initial primitive support for application deployment. Currently
> >   SBCL and Gentoo relative.
>
> Re the second item:
>
>  * Having separate copies of the static files is too much of a
>    maintenance pain.  This deployment example should be purely
>    generated, not included in the repo.
>
>  * If you want to add simple new utility functions, please add them to
>    src/utils (being sure to use the new wexport function where
>    appropriate) instead of new packages and ASDF systems.  If your
>    utilities are sufficiently complex to have their own ASDF system,
>    please distribute them separately, or try to get them integrated with
>    another package, and suggest that Weblocks depend on said separate
>    package.
>
>    It would be too confusing for users for ASDF systems like
>    `clsql-connection-pool' or `assoc-ref' to load from the Weblocks
>    tree.  Anyway, we aren't afraid of adding new dependencies when they
>    bring value to the system.¹
>
>    If you opt to distribute any of these as new projects, distributing
>    via Bitbucket is sufficient, perhaps with a simple Bitbucket wiki
>    page as the project homepage, and a CLiki link to it.
>
> Aside from the point about clsql-connection-pool, I haven't looked too
> closely at your other change yet.
>
> ¹http://failex.blogspot.com/2008/08/dependencies-versus-effort.html
>
> --
> I write stuff athttp://failex.blogspot.com/now.  But the post
> formatter and themes are terrible for sharing code, the primary
> content, so it might go away sooner or later.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to