On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:43:22AM -0800, kilian wrote: > > Hi, > > I am just giving weblocks a first try with the manual, so I > am updating information about joe. Everything's very nice! :) > > But then, I dared to define init-user-session like this: > > (defun init-user-session (comp) > (setf (weblocks:composite-widgets comp) > (list (make-instance 'weblocks:dataform :data joe) > (make-instance 'weblocks:dataform :data > joe)))) > > :-P - Well, maybe I should not... > > The not directly modifed one misses the > changes. So I am wondering: Is this the expected > behaviour?
Yes. Widgets only catch modifications to their own slots, so you sometimes need to give them a little tap by way of MARK-DIRTY. Leslie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
