Jan Rychter <[email protected]> writes: > I am rather appalled at the fact that weblocks with clsql is broken > out of the box. I think this very clearly marks it as very > experimental software, and issues such as backwards compatibility > become moot. We still have a long way to go.
The only reason I didn't merge the branch already is that I wanted to give some existing users a chance to try it out before forcing all CLSQL users to add Bordeaux-Threads and CLSQL-Fluid to their systems. Note that this applies also to Elephant users; see that thread I linked. Considering that this particular bug is only really observable after deployment, and the fix to Weblocks code itself is so minor, I don't think this particular bug says much about the quality of the code itself; just that deployment on the CLSQL backend is new. Which it is; as far as I know hfsbo.com is the first. -- Sorry but you say Nibiru is a Hoax? Doesnt Exist? So maybe The Sumerian people doesnt exist also! --Anonymous by way of SkI --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
