"Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> writes: > On Jan 20, 10:36 am, Jan Rychter <[email protected]> wrote: >> [...] I'd rather first finish the discussion with >> Stephen, as his approach might turn out to be better and the whole issue >> might become moot :-) > > So anyone of you still got to say something you haven't so far?
I don't -- I'm using my code, I'm not that happy with it (could definitely be improved) but it does the job for now. I didn't discover anything better. Plus, I have very little time for pure weblocks work now, so it is unlikely I will do much more in the near future. > If not then I'd like to merge this in and we can work off that. > > No use fussing too much over API issues. Oh, I think we should fuss a lot over API issues, but it should not stop us from developing and trying stuff out. I never managed to design anything right the first time, always had to write things, start using them, and then discover a better way. --J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
