I also think mudballs is the best.  In addition to what Leslie said
about the indexes, I'd also like to see better grouping - perhaps
group by functionality and subgroup by type?  Something like:

Rendering Protocol:
  - Widgets:
    - ...
  - Classes
    - ...
  - Methods
    - ...
  - Utility Functions
    - ...
  - Macros
    - ...

Server Interface:
  ...

Storage API:
  ...

The groupings could be different.  Perhaps mirroring the directory
structure of the sources would be a good place to start.  I don't
know.  I just think grouping like this would be useful, because when
I'm working on an app and want to do something and don't know how off-
hand, I usually end up scanning all the sources related to a
particular functionality, like rendering.  In that kind of scheme,
you'd have some things appear multiple times, but I'd be ok with that.


On Mar 20, 11:21 pm, Robin Lee Powell <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I managed to get all 4 to work; here you go:
>
> Mudballs:
>
>    http://teddyb.org/~rlpowell/public_media/weblocks_docs/mbdocs/weblock...
>
> documentation-template:
>
>    http://teddyb.org/~rlpowell/public_media/weblocks_docs/dt.html
>
> Tinaa:
>
>    http://teddyb.org/~rlpowell/public_media/weblocks_docs/tinaa/weblocks...
>
> atdoc:
>
>    http://teddyb.org/~rlpowell/public_media/weblocks_docs/atdoc/
>
> I'd like to see what people think of them as they stand now.
>
> -Robin
>
> --
> They say:  "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons."
> And I'm thinking:  "Does it even occur to you to try for something
> other than the default outcome?" 
> --http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogrehttp://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/***http://www.lojban.org/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to