How do you feel about replacing the `field' arg with the `field-info' structure object? You might rely on this if you use the `:type' kwarg on any individual field of a `defview' (this is not about the :type for the whole view).
I'm looking for ways to avoid the `:field-info' kwarg on the various RVFV-like GFs, which feels asymmetric to me. Another strategy might be to require that fields can make shallow copies of themselves (prototype pattern, etc). -- Sorry but you say Nibiru is a Hoax? Doesnt Exist? So maybe The Sumerian people doesnt exist also! --Anonymous by way of SkI --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
