Mackram wrote:
> Basically what i am suggesting is that rathere than having the (define- > javascript-backend NAME ROOT FILES) as mentioned in the docs we would > have (define-client-backend NAME :js-root JROOT :js-files JFILES :css- > root CROOT :css-files CFILES). The definition of paths will follow > that of the doc. > > I think this would give us a better step for the future, but I want to > make sure it is inline with what we want to be added to the weblocks > main branch so what do you think? Looks good to me! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
